Section 6: Examples of Implementation Strategies
Accountability is an essential principle for preventing HAIs. It provides the necessary translational link between science and implementation. Without clear accountability, scientifically based implementation strategies will be used in an inconsistent and fragmented way, decreasing their effectiveness in preventing HAIs. Accountability begins with the chief executive officer and other senior leaders who provide the imperative for HAI prevention, thereby making HAI prevention an organizational priority. Senior leadership is accountable for providing adequate resources needed for effective implementation of an HAI prevention program. These resources include necessary personnel (clinical and nonclinical), education, and equipment ( Table 3 ).
Interventions to assist with program implementation that have been reported to be associated with improved outcomes are provided in this section. The references provided are published studies of CAUTI quality improvement projects that specifically describe outcomes. These programs are normally multifactorial and include elements of most or all of the 4 categories of implementation approaches. Practical approaches for problem solving of potential barriers to implementation are provided in Table 4 .
I. Engage
Quality improvement projects directed toward improving compliance with CAUTI guidelines have used various techniques to engage the hospital staff to raise awareness of the issue and increase buy-in.
A. Develop a multidisciplinary team
Physician-led team
Nursing-led team
Leadership of team not specified
B. Involve local champions to promote the program
C. Utilize peer networking
II. Educate
Education of the hospital staff can include in-person sessions or educational material available in paper format or electronically. The educational sessions may outline the evidence behind the guidelines, indicate the goals of the program, and target specific aspects of CAUTI prevention.
Provide educational sessions
Appropriate catheter care
Appropriate indications for catheter insertion
Insertion technique
Hand hygiene education
Physician-directed education
Alternatives for indwelling catheters
Provide educational materials
Indications for urinary catheter utilization
Decision-making algorithim
Bedside binders
Unit-based educational materials
Online learning materials
Patient/family educational materials
III. Execute
The process for making quality improvement changes employs new protocols and algorithms. Interventions may be grouped into "bundles" of practices to be implemented simultaneously. Computer order entry is also increasingly being used to prompt change.
Standardize care processes
Provide daily nursing reminders to physicians to remove unnecessary catheters
Standardize indications for urinary catheter placement
Utilize bladder bundle
Develop a nurse-driven protocol to discontinue catheter if no longer meeting criteria
Employ computerized order entry
Admitting physician alert requiring confirmation of continued indication for previously placed catheters
Change of physician order set from "insert Foley catheter" to patient-initiated "void on call" for appropriate procedures
Mandatory order to remove catheter at 5 days
Best-practice order sets
Use prewritten stop orders
Utilize bladder scanners to measure urine volume
Standardize products
Increase availability of bedside commodes
Conduct individual case reviews
Create redundancy of educational materials
Posters in units
Pocket cards
IV. Evaluate
The success of a CAUTI quality improvement program can be measured by decreased rates of CAUTI, by decreased catheter-days, and by uptake of a new intervention. Most programs have found that providing feedback to the hospital or unit increases awareness.
Measure performance
Compliance with bundle
Compliance with hand hygiene
Provide feedback to staff
CAUTI rates by ward
CAUTI rate by hospital
Hand hygiene rate
Catheter care compliance
Costs of UTI